| Your New Lists Rearrange the fauna and flora according 
to their taxonomic order, but separate the mammals into two groups-herbivores 
and carnivores. This should enable you to recognize biotic relationships not 
even hinted at in the original list. Your rearranged list would be similar to 
the below chart. Finding answers to the following questions will reveal the superiority of
the rearranged list over the original data. In modern ecosystems there are
usually more individual herbivores than carnivores. Was this true of the
Irvington paleoecosystems? Does the list give evidence of still undiscovered
carnivores and herbivores at Irvington? Assuming that it does, would the
discovery of these animals make such difference in the listed
carnivore-herbivore ratio? Why? You now have the basic components necessary for reconstructing our
extinct ecosystem: (1) the nonliving surrounding, found in Dr. Savage’s
description of the Irvington sediments, and (2) the animals and
plants. In other words, information to this point has provided us with a
reasonably clear picture of the ancient Irvington environment and the kinds of
organisms that lived in that environment. 
          
          
            
              | PLANTS | cattails
 willows
 oaks
 |  
              | ANIMALS 
              Invertebrate
 
 Vertebrates
 
 Fishes
 
 Amphibians
 
 
 Reptiles
 
 Birds
 
 
 Mammals
 
 Herbivores
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Carnivores
 | 
 freshwater clams
 freshwater snails
 
 
 
 freshwater fishes
 
 frogs
 toads
 
 turtles
 
 geese
 ducks
 
 
 
 white-footed mice
 voles
 pocket mice
 wood rates
 ground squirrels
 pocket gophers
 rabbits
 ground sloths (two kinds)
 horses
 camels (two kinds)
 peccaries
 oxlike animals
 antelopes
 deer
 mastodons
 mammoths
 
 badgers
 bears
 dire wolves
 foxes
 coyotes
 sabercats (two kinds)
 seals
 |  |